الاثنين، 4 مارس 2019

iPhone X Giveaway 2019 - Chance To Win iPhone X !



download
 Get a $1,149.00 worth iPhone X for free

It is common that liking one of the revolutionary brands like iPhone devices often and seeking for it is a natural thing. People who all are seeking for a long time to have a brand like Apple in your hand can make use of this excellent opportunity.
As we all know the interest for getting isn’t left from anybody. So, guys get ready for this amazing chance of Wining iPhone X from Republic Lab’s 4th Annual iPhone X Giveaway ! Yes, in the name of reward, we would like to give Limited numbers of brand new iPhone for the lucky winners. To grab this great chance, you can follow the below terms and conditions and apply for it.
As a promotional offer of iPhone X, fans of Apple can get their phones by just applying here. So, the lucky person will be selected as the winners and they will be rewarded by this amazing featured phone iPhone X.
To follow this give away, you should follow the terms & conditions and apply for it. Based on the process, the lucky persons will be chosen for iPhone X giveaway and they will be presented with the brand new phone.

iPhone X    

It is considering as one of the revolutionary devices that came out for sale on the tech market. This brand new device will have 5.8 inch super retina screen which will be pleasing to your eyes. The display with a new level of technologies has its way of design with the available of elegantly rounded corners.
Before the arrival of this great phone, most of the people are seeking like a sick for its sale to happen soon. Finally, it’s a dream came for true from Apple. At this condition, we would like to reward this cool phone for the lucky winners.

Features of iPhone X

It is always important for the iPhone fans to know some crazy features of this gorgeous phone. Let’s have a look that what this device has in it to provide us.
  • Exciting animoji’s that captures your face muscle movements
  • Wireless charging from anywhere
  • Facial recognition to lock and unlock
  • OLED display which looks edge to edge
  • Available for dual lens cameras
These are the interesting features of this new arrival from the giant company Apple. It is always an exciting thing for the people to follow. After coming to know about these features, people are pretty much started to fly over the sky to book.


How to Know if you Win?

  • Winners will be announced till 10th of every month. 
  • Winners will receive a Mail from us.
  • Winners will be announced on all of our Social handles. 
  • Winners of all our giveaways are Mentioned on the main Giveaway Page. 

Terms & Conditions

To participate in this giveaway, you need to follow with given terms & conditions. Get a free iPhone X for a limited time.
  • Fill all your exact details as per the instruction to start
  • Available of bonus entry for subscribers
  • Tweet a post on twitter
  • You must follow @repulic_lab on twitter
  • Share on twitter to win more entries
Complete all the above entries to unlock the rest available.
These are the terms & conditions that you need to follow for taking part in the give away of iPhone device. It will be going to be the best giveaway for sure. So, people grab this opportunity soon and it’s a limited time offer.
Click Here
If you are not a fan of an iPhone, who isn’t! Then check our Republic lab giveaway page for other giveaways which are held every month.

الجمعة، 28 أكتوبر 2016

There's just no stopping USC by California as the Trojans roll, 45-24

There's just no stopping USC by California as the Trojans roll, 45-24 


In retrospect, the most surprising part of USC’s first offensive play in a 45-24 win over California on Thursday evening, a 61-yard Ronald Jones II run, was that the Golden Bears stopped him at all.
Jones had scythed inside left tackle Chad Wheeler, breezed past a linebacker grasping at air and flummoxed two defensive backs so thoroughly that they tripped over each other. By the time he ripped a tackler off his back and hightailed down the sideline, a final straggler could just manage to flush him out of bounds which, on Thursday, could almost count as a defensive highlight for the Bears.
The victory was USC’s fourth in a row. After an ignominious start, USC (5-3, 4-2) has reasserted itself as a factor in the Pac-12 South Division race, though it remains behind Utah and Colorado.
USC did what it was supposed to with the nation’s third-worst rushing defense. California vacated wide swaths of the field. USC was happy to fill the void. The Trojans diced the Bears, running at will.







It mattered little that the starter, Justin Davis, was not in uniform as he recovered from a high ankle sprain. Nor did it make a difference that Jones had sputtered in the first half this season. He hadn’t reached 100 yards yet this season. He surpassed that mark by the second quarter. He reached 200 yards for the first time in his career by the third quarter.
Two USC rushers finished with more than 100 yards: Jones accumulated 223 and Aca’Cedric Ware totaled 130.
Jones needed only 18 carries to tear apart California’s defense.
He caught a screen pass in the first quarter and nearly walked into the end zone. He escaped for a 42-yard scamper. He took a handoff in the third quarter, hopped inside the pulling center and cruised for a touchdown.

Somehow, it was USC’s first and only rushing touchdown of the evening. Quarterback Sam Darnold benefited from the rushing attack to turn a prodigious five-touchdowns, 231-yards game, though his evening was marred by turnovers.
When USC Coach Clay Helton jogged to the sideline at halftime, his mouth stretched in a grind, half amused, half pained.
The Trojans were overwhelming California with 451 yards of offense in the first 30 minutes, more than double California’s first-half total.
To that point, Darnold carved up California’s spacious secondary with four touchdown passes in the first half — two to Darreus Rogers, one to Jones and one to Deontay Burnett, making his first start at slot receiver for the injured Steven Mitchell Jr.
USC scored 28 points in the half — their second-highest total in any half this season. Yet Helton knew USC had let points get away.
“We should be up more than we are right now,” Helton said of the 28-10 lead before he joined the team in the halftime locker room.
The refrain has become familiar since Darnold became the starting quarterback, evidence of both his proficiency and his biggest weakness. Earlier this season, the Darnold-led USC offense gashed Utah’s defense but hobbled itself with three turnovers, one a Darnold fumble. A win over Colorado turned tense because of three more turnovers, two on Darnold fumbles.
Against Cal, Darnold endured his highest turnover total yet, with three. A blindside sack by DaVante Wilson jarred the ball loose in the first half. Darnold fumbled on the next possession too. The Bears converted the turnovers into 10 points. He lobbed an interception into double coverage in the fourth quarter.
“Regret it right now,” Helton said when he reemerged for the second half.
The regret intensified briefly when play resumed. USC punted after a three-play opening drive. California quarterback Davis Webb, who finished with 333 yards, orchestrated a 10-play, 71-yard touchdown drive, capped by a quarterback keeper for a touchdown, to pull California within 11 points.
Jones responded with his touchdown run on the very next drive, as if offended that Webb had beaten him to a rushing score.



https://viral481.com/srv.html?id=4832361&pub=894534

https://viral481.com/srv.html?id=5466486&pub=894534

https://viral481.com/srv.html?id=5466487&pub=894534

https://viral481.com/srv.html?id=5470078&pub=894534
TAGS:
#jacksonville #jaguars #vs #tennessee #titans #predictions , #tennessee #titans , jacksonville jaguars,  #jacksonville #jaguars , #louisville #football , louisville football , los angeles weather, #los #angeles #weather  , oklahoma state football, #oklahoma #state #football

الخميس، 12 مايو 2016

Alaska May Offer a View to Future Elections

WASHINGTON — It’s tempting to write off anything that happens in Alaska politics as just plain weird, the result of irregular sunlight or too many low-altitude flights. And maybe that explains what’s happening in the country’s last undecided Senate race, where Senator Lisa Murkowski now seems likely to pull off an unlikely victory as a write-in candidate, after having been ousted by a Tea Party candidate in a Republican primary in August.
But it’s also possible that Alaska’s defiant electorate, like the California voters who just approved a radical change to their voting system, is actually telling us something important about where American politics is headed, at a time when our system for selecting candidates feels increasingly anachronistic.
Alaska election officials began scrutinizing and counting some 92,000 write-in votes on Wednesday — about 11,000 more votes than were cast for Joe Miller, Ms. Murkowski’s Republican opponent. Assuming almost all of those write-in votes ultimately end up in Ms. Murkowski’s column, she would be the first write-in candidate to win a Senate election since Strom Thurmond, who did it in 1954 after Democratic Party leaders in South Carolina gave him the boot for endorsing Dwight D. Eisenhower.
What makes Ms. Murkowski’s potential victory different and especially surprising is that she was, in fact, her party’s original preferred candidate. This means that a lot of voters who weren’t as ideological or as motivated as the Tea Partiers had to go to the trouble of spelling out her three-syllable name, rather than simply checking a box. If they made a movie, it would be called “The Establishment Strikes Back.”

The ballot review process in Juneau included a challenged write-in of “Lesa Murkoski” instead of Lisa Murkowski.
CreditChristopher Miller for The New York Times

It’s impossible to know, of course, exactly whom Ms. Murkowski’s write-in votes came from. As many as half probably came from more moderate Republicans, judging from her vote totals in August and November. And polling before the election indicated that as many as a third of registered Democratic voters were open to switching their support to Ms. Murkowski, too, if that’s what it took to deny Mr. Miller a victory. (Among the things Mr. Miller became known for during the campaign: citing East Germany as an example of effective border security.)
But chances are that Ms. Murkowski also reeled in some significant bloc of unaffiliated voters, who make up about half the electorate in Alaska.
Something like 230,000 Alaskans appear to have cast ballots in this month’s midterm election, compared with fewer than 146,000 who voted in the Republican and Democratic primaries combined. A CNN/Time poll in the weeks before the election showed Ms. Murkowski edging Mr. Miller among independent voters, even though she wasn’t actually on the ballot.
What all of this probably means is that some critical number of independent voters decided they didn’t like the options the two parties had given them, and they were willing to go to the trouble of writing in a candidate who seemed to have a real chance of winning rather than pull levers A or B.
This was bound to happen somewhere. There was a time in America when our primary process made perfect sense, because most voters identified closely with one party or the other, and it was safe to assume that someone who wanted to participate would choose a team. In the 1950s, independents lagged behind both parties, making up less than a quarter of the electorate.
Representatives of the Murkowski and Miller campaigns joined Alaska officials in inspecting ballots.CreditRick Bowmer/Associated Press

That number has risen steadily, however, especially among younger voters, to the point where independents have recently overtaken both parties, hovering around 40 percent. A recent Pew Center poll found that the number of voters who identified themselves as independents had risen five percentage points since 2002.
You have to wonder, given this trend, whether the primary process as we’ve known it can remain tenable. With each passing year, it seems, an ever smaller group of voters in either party — rallying, in a year like this one, around ever more extreme points of view — get to effectively determine the options for the rest of the electorate.
It’s a dynamic that this year prompted major change in California, the state where most innovations — fast food, computer chips, etc. — spring to life before sweeping eastward. In an initiative championed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and opposed by both parties, voters approved an open primary system in which candidates of all qualifying parties will be put on the same primary ballot. Then the top two vote-getters will enter a runoff in November, regardless of party.
The idea is that nonpartisan voters, too, will get to take part in winnowing down their choices for November. And candidates will have to appeal to a much wider array of voters during the primary phase of the campaign, rather than just to Tea Partiers or the most liberal activists.
This kind of system might well be the norm in America in 10 or 15 years, as a more independent generation of voters ascends toward middle age. If not, expect to see more primary uprisings among sharply ideological voters followed by more write-in rebellions like Lisa Murkowski’s. If anything’s weird in Alaska this year, it has more to do with the system than it does with the state.




http://lnkclik.com/7bn1

http://lnkclik.com/7bn3
 

Sheridan Smith pulls out of Funny Girl for up to a month because of stress


Sheridan Smith is to miss up to a month of performances as Fanny Brice in her West End show Funny Girl due to stress and exhaustion.
Concerns were raised after Smith missed three consecutive shows after the Baftas on Sunday night, with the Savoy theatre announcing that she was “indisposed”.
But in a statement on Thursday, the producers of the show said Smith would be taking a two- to four-week leave of absence during this “difficult time”, and would be replaced by her understudy, Natasha Barnes.
“The entire team at Funny Girl is thinking of Sheridan, and know she is getting the rest and support she needs during this very difficult and stressful time. We will all miss her enormously and send her our love and best wishes.”
They assured ticketholders that Smith’s departure was temporary, adding that “we are looking forward to her return to the show in due course”.
The announcement follows suggestions that Smith is struggling to deal with the emergence of news that her father, to whom she is very close, was diagnosed with cancer in March. It is the same disease which killed her brother a decade ago.
She had previously accused producers of pressuring her into returning to Funny Girl before she was ready. Shortly afterwards, a production was stopped just 15 minutes into the play.

The stoppage was attributed to technical difficulties, though there were reports that audience members claimed Smith was drunk and slurring her words on stage. This has been denied as “categorically untrue” by her publicist.
The incident was the subject of a quip by Graham Norton at the Baftas on Sunday, who said: “We’re all excited for a couple of drinks tonight. Or, as it’s known in theatrical circles, a few glasses of ‘technical difficulties’.”
Following the Baftas, Smith had also responded angrily to suggestions in the press that she had been a sore loser after missing out on the award for best actress for her role in The C WordThose with tickets for Funny Girl over the next month will be left disappointed by the announcement, as Smith’s critically acclaimed performance was the main draw for many.She said on Twitter that she was “not strong enough” to perform in Funny Girl on Monday, adding: “Well done press! U let down me, the cast & everyone who spent money to see me. I apologise profusely! Sorry!”
However, Barnes has garnered glowing reviews from audiences over the past three days, with praise that she had “blown everyone away”, and she received a standing ovation after the Wednesday matinee.
Funny Girl became the fastest-selling show at the Menier Chocolate Factory in London before transferring to the West End this year.

Assassin's Creed: five things we learned from the first trailer

Michael Fassbender’s movie already looks better than Warcraft, with Marion Cotillard on top femme fatale form and director Justin Kurzel embracing the video game

Along with Duncan Jones’s Warcraft it’s been billed as the video game movie that might just make us forget all about the cinematic crimes of Uwe Boll and his ilk, that can induce glorious amnesia for those struggling to wipe clean memories of Prince of Persia, Hitman or Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life.





The omens so far are good. Assassin’s Creed comes from the team behind last year’s blistering new take on Macbeth, with director Justin Kurzel bringing back his stars Michael Fassbender (also a hands-on producer) and Marion Cotillard. Here are five takeaways from the first trailer for the film.

Marion Cotillard is doing her best femme fatale

How strange that the cute copine from France’s hit Taxi comedies has developed into one of the most sublime screen beauties of modern Hollywood. Ever since Christopher Nolan cast her as a limbo-bound spirit trapped in Leonardo DiCaprio’s consciousness in Inception, Cotillard has been the go-to actor for twisted femme fatales, a modern day Simone Simon, or Gallic Rita Hayworth. Her Sophia Rikkin here also recalls the Oscar-winner’s startling turn in Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises as Talia Al Ghul. Both are scions of an ancient order, Rikkin part of the Knights Templar, Al Ghul a descendant of the similarly destructive League of Assassins (DC Comics version). What perfect casting.

Michael Fassbender’s Callum Lynch has to die to live

As the trailer opens, our hero has just been tried and executed for doing some very bad things. So what a surprise to wake up and find he’s about to be primed for transfer to the past, where he’ll learn skills from an ancestor. Fans of the video game will recognise the tan and teal filtered medical facility as a base for Abstergo Industries, the modern day successor to the evil Knights Templar. We’re told Lynch is a descendant of the rival Assassin’s guild – in the games Abstergo is unaware of his background, and sends him back in search of powerful artefacts known as the “Pieces of Eden”.

Nobody expected the Spanish inquisition

Ok, that’s not strictly true. It’s long been established that Kurzel’s big screen adaptation will borrow a timeline the game series first visited in 2009’s Assassin’s Creed II. Once he’s picked up those vital skills, word is Lynch will return to the 21st century to use them on his sworn Templar enemies. For once, the fact that renaissance Spain looks like an all-CGI affair makes some sort of sense. This is a video game riff, after all.

Justin Kurzel has transformed video game tropes into nightmarish discombobulation

How do you take the clunky furniture required to make a video game such as Assassin’s Creed work and make it interesting for filmgoers? The answer, Kurzel appears to have decided, is to play on the inherent weirdness of the “Animus” device that transports players back in time on their PlayStations. To be plucked from reality and thrown into the body of an ancestor is to experience a nightmarish sense of discombobulation, the Australian film-maker seems to be saying. Those white coats and pristine clean facilities speak to an immediate sense of body horror as Kurzel chooses to flag up the unnatural quality of the game’s conceit, rather than ignore it.

Assassin’s Creed already looks like a much smoother game-to-movie transfer than Warcraft

Kurzel’s film will debut in December, six months after Duncan Jones’s troubled Warcraft, which trailers so far suggest might find itself weighed down by its own video game legacy. The film’s background as a multiplayer game seems to have persuaded Jones to throw in a multitude of colourful orcs and humans, with the fear being that few of them will really stand out for those who have not played the game. By contrast Assassin’s Creed, as the progeny of a game that’s traditionally been more of a single player affair, can focus entirely on its trump card, the intensely watchable Fassbender.